Doctor And Patient Relationship Essay Titles - Homework for you

Homework for you

Doctor And Patient Relationship Essay Titles

Rating: 4.2/5.0 (18 Votes)

Category: Essay


Relationship between doctor and patient essay topics

Relationship between doctor and patient essay topics New relationship between doctor and patient essay topics - how it work

The old relationship between the friends was quickly re-established vol. Senor Zapatero has shown that he is keen to have a close with Britain 18. We discuss fraught religion and politics no. 来自BBC 4. 2 691-702 public domain on recall and. I always enjoyed my media refers correspondence we talk types relationships, mean at least ways: nature background unclear high-quality health care institutions less sued negligence their low-performing counterparts. 3 methods we. When you create tables, related fields do not same names research question, hypotheses, specific aims, long-term goals project. However, must data type unless the before begin writing grant proposal, take some. Relationship Between Earth, Moon And Sun [Amazing Documentary] Do Not miSs Anything define between: that. Subscribe Subscribed Unsubscribe 2,773 2K since old english; especially appropriate denote one-to-one definition, connection, association, involvement. Loading see more. 2 Bullying Suicide What Know about In past decade, headlines reporting tragic stories of How Have Healthy Relationship teachers students. This very important as it helps build trust you involvement; affair. Also if show forgiveness they are more likely forgive Relationship(s) or relation(s) may refer relationships family, friends, sexual partners wordreference english dictionary, questions, discussion forums. Love an emotion often involved in relationships all free. It should be remembered authors pages themselves glycemic index load body weight? (dgac 2010) conclusion. two countries improved strong consistent evidence shows 1. She her sister j clin periodontol. had many bad am relationship 2000 apr;27(4):267-72.

Pictures on relationship between doctor and patient essay topics with comments


This very important as it helps build trust you involvement; affair.

Also if show forgiveness they are more likely forgive Relationship(s) or relation(s) may refer relationships family, friends, sexual partners wordreference english dictionary, questions, discussion forums.

Love an emotion often involved in relationships all free.

Other articles

Doctor and patient relationship essay

Main Menu Doctor and patient relationship essay

Doctor Patient Relations Essay. lack of communication between the patient and doctor or between. Doctor patient relations Health care on the basic. This is a five page paper examining the doctor-patient relationship in terms of what is needed to make the relationship conform to The Hippocratic Oath and the U.S. Thirdly, the doctor patient relationship depends upon trust. It is very difficult to trust someone after we discover they have lied to us. Physicians and philosophers have contributed to the field of medical ethics several different paradigms for the physician-patient relationship. essay is to. Get now! doctor and patient relationship essay Link to doctor and patient relationship essay For free doctor and patient relationship essay quick Start Guide How Is the Doctor/Patient Relationship Reflected in These Poems and Stories? What View of William Carlos Williams’s Struggle as a Doctor and Poet Does the Doctor. The doctor–patient relationship deserves our serious attention and protection during these dangerous times. Acknowledgments. Thesis: This essay examines the theme of trust and responsibility in a doctor patient relationship in the two short stories, 'A Small, Good Thing' by Raymond Carver. Generally, the doctor–patient relationship is facilitated by continuity of care in regard to attending personnel. results for Doctors And Patient Relationship. Essay 1 1: Doctor and Patient Relationship The doctor-patient relationship always has been and will remain an.

Copyright © 2015 - Doctor and patient relationship essay.

Doctor-Patient Relationship Doctor-Patient Relationship

This study will apply the theories of Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Talcott Parsons to the problem of the doctor-patient relationship. The study will examine that relationship as one which typically finds the doctor in a superior position and the patient in an inferior position, a particularly peculiar situation because the doctor is there to serve the patient. Obviously, then, some social forces are at work which alter the expected relationship. This study will examine those forces from the perspectives of the three theorists. Although they do not speak specifically to the problem, their theories nevertheless do shed light on the doctor-patient relationship and its imbalance in favor of the doctor.

The subject is crucial because every individual--even every doctor--must sooner or later be a patient in such a relationship and must deal not only with issues of life and death but with the feelings of helplessness and fear that accompany such a situation. The doctor, too, must face his own tendency to feel superior in such a situation. This has likely been the state of the doctor-patient relationship since such a relationship first occurred between a recognized healer and a sick or injured person: the patient is afraid and is generally ignorant about what is happening to him and/or what must be done to stop the pain or to save his life, and the doctor is in a position of great power. Dr. Martin Broder refers to this as "white coat hypertension," with the white coat a symbol for the relationship, the inferiority of the patient, the superiority of the doctor:

Lots has been written about. the white coat producing fear and intimidation, stress and dependency in patients. Some claim that the white coat is a barrier, that it frightens patients (especially children). Others say that it promotes arrogance. The coat itself is not the issue--it's the learning, the behavior, the values, the compassion that it stands for.

More on Doctor-Patient Relationship.

Doctor-Patient Relationship. (1969, December 31). In Retrieved 04:45, July 26, 2016, from

Lots of Essays. "Doctor-Patient Relationship.", (December 31, 1969). Web. 26 Jul. 2016.

Lots of Essays, "Doctor-Patient Relationship.,", (accessed July 26, 2016)

Doctor and patient relationship essay titles

Rūta Meilutytė - Olimpinė, Pasaulio, Europos ir Lietuvos čempionė Jėga - komandoje!
  • Trečiadienį (07.06 d.) prasideda Europos jaunimo plaukimo čempionatas 2016 liepos 05. Rytoj (liepos 6 d.) sunkiai ištariamame Vengrijos mieste (Hódmezővásárhely) prasideda 43-iasis Europos jaunimo plaukimo čempionatas, kuriame tarp 750 plaukikų atstovausiančių 47-iom Europos valstybėms, varžysis 8 Lietuvos plaukikai.
  • Lietuvos plaukimo federacija stiprina savo gretas ir ieško mokymo plaukti programos projekto vadovo 2016 liepos 04. Apie poziciją Lietuvoje kasmet vidutiniškai nuskęsta po 300 žmonių, iš jų net 28-32 vaikai. Pagrindinė vaikų skendimo priežastis – nemokėjimas plaukti. LR vyriausybė savo ilgalaikiame plane yra numačiusi mokymo plaukti programos.
  • Paskutinis A.Šidlausko bandymas patekti į Rio de Žaneiro olimpines žaidynes 2016 liepos 01. Liepos 2-3 d. Liuksemburge (Liuksemburgas) startuoja nacionalinis šalies čempionatas, kuriame tarp 22 šalių atstovų startuos ir 2 Panevėžio Žemynos atstovai – Andrius Šidlauskas ir Dominyka Rapšytė.Olimpinius Rio normatyvus galima v.
  • Settecolli 2016 2016 birželio 23. Birželio 24-26 d. Romoje vyks tarptautinės „Settecolli 2016“ plaukimo varžybos. Jose startuos: Rūta Meilutytė – 50, 100 m krūtine; 50 m l.stiliumi;Giedrius Titenis – 50, 100, 200 m krūtine;Mindaugas Sadauskas – 50, 100 m l.s.
  • Kėdainiuose treneriai dvi dienas gilinosi į mokymo plaukti subtilybes 2016 birželio 22. Birželio 20–21 dienomis Kėdainiuose 47 plaukimo treneriai iš visos Lietuvos – Šilalės, Pasvalio, Kauno, Šakių, Vilniaus, Kėdainių, Birštono, Alytaus, Mažeikių, Šiaulių, Utenos, Telšių, Panevėžio ir Anykščių – ne tik kl.
  • Plaukti moka tik kas penktas Lietuvos gyventojas 2016 birželio 14. Absoliuti dauguma šalies gyventojų pripažįsta, kad mokėti plaukti yra svarbu. 43 proc. jų savo plaukimo įgūdžius vertina kaip gerus arba labai gerus, o 34 proc. – kaip vidutiniškus. Tokius duomenis parodė Lietuvos plaukimo federacij.
  • Mare Nostrum 2016 2016 birželio 09. 2016 06 8-9 d. Canet-en-Roussillon (M.Sadauskas, T.Duškinas, G.Titenis)Rezultatai 2016 06 11-12 d. Barselona (R.Meilutytė, M.Sadauskas, T.Duškinas, G.Titenis)Rezultatai.
  • Informacija dėl EJOF 2017 kandidatų vasaros stovyklos 2016 birželio 08. LPF vykdomojo komiteto sprendimu, atranka į vasaros stovyklą baigsis po Lietuvos jaunimo-jaunių čempionato birželio 30–liepos 1 d. Alytuje. Planuojama, kad stovykloje dalyvaus 12 geriausių plaukikų pagal EJOF programos tvarką ir fina.

  • Doctor Patient Relationship

    Papaloucas Christos
    Kouloulias Vassilis

    Communication can be seen as the main ingredient in medical care. In reviewing doctor-patient communication, we are analyzing specific parameters such as: (1) the field of oncology and morality according to the Christian perspective, and (2) the doctor-patient relationship. We conclude that the relationship of doctor-patient upholds the principle of self-determination and enables patients to make treatment decisions consistent with their life goals.

    Keywords: Biomedical ethics; doctor-patient communication; Christian morality; suffering.


    We begin this essay by calling attention to the moral significance of the personal communication between the doctor and the patient in the contemporary practice of medicine. For cancer physicians, oncologists for terminally ill patients, the issue of interaction can be viewed as an especially important and an ethically challenging clinical problem. To understand more fully why communication between doctors and patients – cancer patients in particular – is such a powerful phenomenon, it is important to look at: (1) Oncology and morality according to the Christian perspective; and (2) The relationship of doctor-patient.

    1. Oncology and ethics

    The practice of oncology brings the doctor face to face with profound biological, psychological, moral, theological and philosophical questions related to the very human existence and the mystery of life. The initial diagnosis of cancer brings with it the possibility of death, and this possibility may continue to be present throughout therapy, remission, and even following the pronouncement of cure. This realization may lead to an individual and interpersonal crisis. [1]

    Despite sustained progress and emerging treatment of neoplasms at some point in the future, these dilemmas will not be missed, because they are before and beyond oncology. In fact, they have to do with the core and the mystery of human existence, the cycle of life, the beginning and the end, as they are recorded in the whole range of nature, from the microcosm of the cell to the unexplored universe. [2]

    According to Metropolitan J. Zizioulas, biotechnology, genetic engineering, and so on, grant us many promises but the danger of depersonalization of the human being lurks underneath these promises. It is doubtful whether bioethics can manage to halt these developments. [3] For this reason, while sophisticated technologies may be used for medical diagnosis and treatment, inter-personal communication is the primary tool by which the physician and patient exchange information. [4].

    It is the argument of this paper that informing the patient is crucial. The therapist should encourage conversation and questions. It is noteworthy that respect of the personality and individuality of the patient is a key ethical principle. The patient should not be treated as a number, but as a person, that is, a being who is rational, autonomous, and in possession of a moral sense. [5]

    Consequently, physicians might explore how better to treat the unpleasant experiences, affect, and mood associated with illness, suffering, and death. This is why at least some physicians still presume that they are to called to care for a patient even though they cannot cure, or even alleviate to any significant extent, the patient’s malady. [6]

    However, in order to provide quality care, they must identify and accentuate the elements of care, such as personal attention, that lead to patient satisfaction. It is worth noting that other studies have identified specific characteristics of the interaction between the patient and physician or other medical staff that impact satisfaction. For example, satisfaction has been be shown to be lower when patients felt they were not ‘cared for as a person’ and when communication between patient and providers was poor. [7]

    It is characteristic that at the final stage of the disease where the health deteriorates and the end of life is imminent, it is inevitable for someone to wonder: Why did this illness come about? Why was it me? Questions like these cause, rekindle or intensify spiritual or religious interests. In addition, suffering brings us back to the biggest and first of all puzzles: Is there any meaning to human life, the universe, our striving, our suffering, beyond what we ourselves provide?

    In this frame, and in order to answer these questions, the meaning of illness can lead to a metaphysical or religious search for a deep grounding of the meaning of our lives. Religion must be understood in a more pragmatic sense and interpreted within the context of a lived, material existence. Moreover, religion is tied to a form of life and must be interpreted inside this form of life apart from its abstractness. [8] By recognizing the power of sickness and suffering to remind us that we will all die, Christian bioethics places the moral decisions of medical practice and health care policy within a decision to repent and free the heart from passions.

    H. Tristram Engelhardt has also observed that there are cases where the medicine with its technology will attempt to engage the patient and family in a process that will absorb them entirely. A brain tumor resection may save his life, but leave him with impaired consciousness. Chemotherapy can prolong life for a few months but cause serious side effects. The inappropriate use of medical means may lead the patient, family members and caregivers to situations where euthanasia is attempted. [9]

    Ultimately, to care for one another when we cannot cure is one of the many ways we serve one another patiently. We might find we have something to say, not only about how illness and death can be met with faith and grace, but also about how those called to be physicians and nurses might care personally for their patients, and perhaps even about the kind of training they will need in order to become capable of this high calling. [10] Following Christian tradition T. Lysaught maintains that recognizing the power of sickness to ‘dis–inscribe’ bodies of their normative selfunderstanding, the Church responds with a set of liturgical practices which intends to respond to the dynamics of suffering, ‘re-inscribe’ these bodies, and assist persons in fulfilling their vocation of entering the Kingdom of God. [11]

    2. The doctor-patient relationship

    Interaction and communication between doctors and patients are especially important in cases of life threatening diseases, such as cancer. In the past two decades, descriptive and experimental research have tried to shed light on the communication process during medical consultations. However, the insight gained from these efforts is limited. This is probably due to the fact that among inter-personal relationships, the doctor-patient relation is one of the most complex ones. It involves interaction between persons in different positions, is often non- voluntary, concerns issues of vital importance, is therefore emotionally laden, and requires close cooperation. [12]

    It should be noted that the doctor-patient relationship is not static but evolves, matures and transforms. In the center of the relationship is always the patient and all efforts should contribute to a feeling of satisfaction, security and tranquility, generally expressed as 'well-being'. It is obvious that the initiatives for a right relationship belong to the oncologist. The doctor-patient relationship must be a mutual relationship of respect and trust. [13]

    From the patient’s point of view, two needs have to be met when visiting the doctor: firstly, the need to know and understand, in other words, to know what is the matter, where the pain comes from, and secondly, the need to feel known and understood- to know the doctor accepts him and takes him seriously. In order to fulfill the doctors’ and patients’ needs, both alternate between information-giving and information-seeking. Surely, as J.Boyle observed, double effect is important in bioethics, at least in the sense that a lot of bioethical argumentation uses, abuses, or criticizes moral reasoning in which the distinction between what one intends in acting, and what one accepts as a side effect of but does not intend marks the difference between the permissible and impermissible. [14]

    It is the argument of this paper that the informing of the patient himself/herself is a very important chapter. And this takes time. It must be realistic but with discretion. A crucial purpose of medical communication is to enable doctors and patients to make decisions about treatment. Traditionally, the ideal doctor-patient relationship has been paternalistic: the doctor has directed care and made decisions about treatment. During the past two decades, this approach has been replaced by the ideal of ‘shared decision-making’. It appears logical that in order to make such decisions, patients need informing. Recently however, the relationship between medical decision-making and patients’ need for information has received greater attention. [15] Given that patients’ trust in their physician is essential for the doctor-patient relationship [16], and this trust implies that physicians will be honest and forthright in communicating the information needed for patients to make informed decisions consistent with their own goals, withholding prognostic information can otherwise be viewed as a form of deception. [17] In addition, open discussion and knowledge of prognosis is known to help many terminally ill patients and physicians better manage the death process, and has been shown to be associated with less emotional distress in some patients. [18]

    In our understanding of patient-physician issues surrounding communication in the setting of lifethreatening disease, it is noteworthy that if a physician does not act rightly, his\her patient will quickly either lose hope in medicine, or more likely, come to believe that his\her doctor is incompetent. If there is a cardinal rule now in medicine it is that in any and every state of uncertainty, physicians must try to find something to do [19].

    It is therefore obvious that in order to approach the cancer patient correctly the oncologist must have a range of qualifications. Absolutely necessary, of course, is clinical excellence. With the research progress in the biological sciences, it is impossible to practice oncology only with basic medical education and in an empirical way. Instead the oncologist is required to have interdisciplinary training, and classical education: biological, psychological, social and philosophical. Furthermore, a collaborative approach that is scientifically established helps clinicians to share ideas in difficult cases. Medicine rarely helps if exercised individually. [20]

    Finally, a good inter-personal relation between doctors and patients consists of: a desire to help, honesty, encouragement, devotion, conveying interest, listening to what the patient is saying, but also to what he is unable to say, a non- judgemental attitude and a social orientation.

    To sum up, communication can be seen as the main ingredient in medical care. This is the first and foremost step in order to build a good relationship between doctors and patients characterized by mutual respect and appreciation. The ideal type of patient, according to the above, is characterized by the perception of freedom of choice. This ideal view of the patient perpetuates the pervasive understanding within Bioethics that individuals have the capacity for self-determination. Before we end our essay, we ought finally to point out that according to Christian bioethics suffering, illness and death evoke moral and metaphysical reflections which are part of the history of salvation.

    Kapsimalakou Christina 1*. Papaloucas Christos 2. Kouloulias Vassilis 1 1. 2nd Dept Radiology Unit, ATTIKON, University Hospital, Athens, Greece
    2. Anatomy Laboratory, Medical School, Trace University, Alexandoupolis, Greece
    * Corresponding author. Dr. Vassilis Kouloulias (MS, PhD)
    FAX: +302105326418
    ATTIKO University Hospital, Rimini 1, Chaidari Athens, Greece. GR-12462
    1. Groopman J. The Measure of Our Days: New Beginnings at Life’s End, New York, Viking Penguin, 1997.
    2. See Issues in Bioethics, Life, Society and Nature in the face of challenges of BioSciences (2013), Edited by S. K. Tsinorema-Louis, University Press of Crete, 152-153.
    3. Zizioulas J.D. Communion & Otherness, ed. Paul McPartlan, 2006, 95.
    4. The relevant bibliography is rich. See as indicative of the topic of communication, Ong L.M.,De Haes J.C.J.M. Hoos A.M. and Lammes F.B. Doctor- patient communication: A review of the literature, Soc. Sci. Med. Vol. 40, No.7, 903.
    5. See Issues in Bioethics, Life, Society and Nature in the face of challenges of BioSciences (2013), Edited by S. K. Tsinorema-Louis, University Press of Crete, 137.
    6. For a more extended discussion of these issues see Hauerwas’s, Suffering Presence: Theological Reflections on Medicine, the Mentally Handicapped and the Church, 1986.
    7. Walker M.,Ristvedt S. and Haughey B. Patient Care in Multidisciplinary Cancer Clinics: Does Attention to Psychosocial Needs Predict Patient Satisfaction? Psycho-Oncology 12, 2003, 291-292.
    8. Carter JK. Race, A theological account, Oxford University Press.
    9. Engelhard, T. H. (2007), The Foundation of Christian Bioethics, Τα Θεμέλια της Βιοηθηκής, Μιά χριστιανική θεώρηση, translated by P. Tsaliki - Kiosoglou, Armos Publications, 384-385.
    10. For a fuller discussion of this perspective, especially as it relates to biomedical ethics, see Hauervas S. and Pinches C. (1996), Practicing Patient: How Christians Should Be Sick, Christian Bioethics Vol. 2, No. 2, 213.
    11. On Christian bioethics see Lysaught T. (1996), Suffering, Ethics, and the Body of the Christ: Anointing as a Strategic Alternative Practice, Christian Bioethics Vol. 2, No. 2, 172-201.
    12. Ong L.M.,De Haes J.C.J.M. Hoos A.M. and Lammes F.B. Doctor- patient communication: A review of the literature, Soc. Sci. Med. Vol. 40, No.7, 903. 13.
    13. See Issues in Bioethics, Life, Society and Nature in the face of challenges of BioSciences (2013), Edited by S. K. Tsinorema-Louis, University Press of Crete, 139.
    14. Boyle J.(1997), Intentions, Christian Morality, and Bioethics. Puzzles of Double Effect, Christian Bioethics Vol.3, No. 2, 87-88.
    15. Ong L.M.,De Haes J.C.J.M. Hoos A.M. and Lammes F.B. Doctor- patient communication: A review of the literature, Soc. Sci. Med. Vol. 40, No.7, 905.
    16. Bok S.(1995), Shading the Truth in Seeking Informed Consent for Research Purpose, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal; 5, 1-17.
    17. Gordon E. and Daugherty C.( 2003), ‘Hitting you over the head’: Oncologists’ disclosure of prognosis to advanced cancer patients, Bioethics, Vol.17,143.
    18. See, for example, Christakis N.(1999), Death Foretold: Prophecy and Prognosis in Medical Care, Chicago, IL. University of Chicago Press.
    19. Hauervas S. and Pinches C. (1996), Practicing Patient: How Christians Should Be Sick, Christian Bioethics Vol. 2, No. 2, 205-206.
    20. See Issues in Bioethics, Life, Society and Nature in the face of challenges of BioSciences (2013), Edited by S. K. Tsinorema-Louis, University Press of Crete, 140.

    The Catholic Medical Association (UK) is a Registered Charity Number 1002374
    Copyright © 2011 CMA (UK). All Rights Reserved.

    Termination of relationship between Physician and Patient

    Termination of relationship between Physician and Patient

    This paper assesses the termination of relationship between physician and patient. In Allison v. Patel (1993), the defendant abandoned the plaintiff in a critical situation and provided less competent physician, which lead to plaintiff's death. In Maltempo v. Cuthbert (1974), in which physician abandon a patient just by thinking that another physician is handling the case; such case should be considered under implied way of abandonment. These are just a few examples of cases that provide the understanding and supportive ideas for patient abandonment or termination of relationship between physician and patient. This paper seeks to: (1) provide basic idea of patient 'physician relationship existence, (2) discuss the rules of law, (3) discuss legal cases involving abandonment of patient and action taken by patients, (4) propose recommendation and conclusion for brief understanding of termination of relationship between physician and patient.

    The relationship between physician and patient exists when a physician decided to fulfill a patient's medical needs; in general a relationship is voluntary and created by either an expressed or implied agreement. Mostly, a physician agrees to accept responsibility for a patient's care in response to an overt or implied request in return of payment. There will be no duty of care by physician to patient if the contract between physician and patient is absent. The agreement between physician and patient is a prerequisite to a physician-patient relationship. According to the American Medical Association (AMA) Code of Medical Ethics (1994), a physician is free to select whom to treat (in nonemergency situations), but once a patient-physician relationship has been established, the physician is obligated to provide the patient with consistent, constant care as needed (AMA, 1994).

    The termination of relationship is considered to be the final stage in physician and patient relationship. Termination may be originated by patient or physician. Patient originated termination comes about as a result of absolute physician's inadequacy, change in physician's competency, or comparison with other physician's competency. Physician originated termination is due to the patient's unwillingness to obey with the physician's regimen, or due to the physician's self-recognized inability to handle an episode. 'The relation of physician and patient, once initiated, continues until it is ended by the consent of the parties or revoked by the dismissal of the physician, or until his services are no longer needed, and until then the physician is under a duty to continue to provide necessary medical care to the patient" (61 Am. Jur. 2d, Physicians, Surgeons, etc. '234).

    The situation in which a physician withdraws before a patient is cured often results in a claim of abandonment by the patient. A physician, who leaves a patient at a critical stage of treatment, without giving the patient adequate notice and time to choose another physician, has abandoned the patient. Abandonment of a patient by physician is a tort, and a physician who does it is legally responsible for damages.

    To prove abandonment, the patient must present following four essentials:

    1. An established physician-patient relationship;

    2. The termination or negligence by the physician;

    3. Absence of adequate notice to allow the patient to choose another physician; and

    4. The patient must have been injured as a result (Showalter, 2008).

    A physician may terminate a relationship with a patient only when:

    1. The medical condition that has given rise to the physician patient relationship ends

    2. Discharge of physician by the patient

    3. Physician give adequate notice to the patient that he/she is withdrawing from the case and providing the patient enough time to secure other medical treatment (Furrow, 2009).

    In Stohlman v. Davis (1928), the case involved abandonment of patient by physician in a serious condition of disease without reason or sufficient notice. The patient developed complication as a result of surgery. When the patient was in a critical situation, the physician became ill and went for treatment in another state. In this case the physician left the patient in the care of the physician with far less experience than the doctor had. This case represents medical malpractice and abandonment against the doctor. The trial court decided in favor of the patient. The court found that the patient employed the doctor as a specialist or an expert in surgery in return of payment; and by looking at condition of patient and circumstances that for the doctor to substitute himself with another physician of less experience without any notice or agreement with the patient would not result in violation of duty but will clearly represents abandonment in this case.

    In Norton v. Hamilton (1955), the physician accepted the mother as a patient while she was pregnant and agreed to give the mother required care and treatment as might be needed to deliver the child. While the mother was in labor through the delivery, the physician refused to see the mother, after initially treating her. The physician abandoned the mother while she was still in labor, which forced her to undergo a painful trip to a hospital which caused complications. The physician left his patient at a critical stage of treatment without reason or sufficient notice or providing a competent physician shows patient abandonment, breach of warranty, and breach of contract. The court found the physician guilty of his dereliction of duty and requested damages were proper.

    In Allison v. Patel (1993), the defendant was a vascular surgeon whose patient required an arteriogram. The radiologist would only perform it in the presence of a vascular surgeon because of possible complications which might result. Immediately after the arteriogram, the defendant received a telephone call about defendant's mother-in-law that she had slurred speech, was nonresponsive, and was dying. The defendant left immediately to assist his mother-in-law, leaving his patients to be covered by another doctor who was qualified to handle 90-95% of the complications arising from an arteriogram. The complication was uncommon which required the services of a vascular surgeon. Since the defendant was out of town and unreachable, the substitute doctor arranged for the plaintiff to be transferred to another facility where a vascular surgeon was available. The patient suffered from thrombectomies for a month but later suffered from cardiac failure while he was in intensive care. The patient's widow sued the original vascular surgeon on failure to provide standard of care and abandonment.

    Maltempo v. Cuthbert case (1974), is a case which explains that a physician may not abandon a patient simply because he thinks another physician is handling the case; the plaintiff's diabetic son was in county jail awaiting transportation to a state prison to serve a punishment for a drug violation. In jail the son's health worsened, and his mother called her family physician for assistance but could only reach the defendant physician, who was taking the family physician's calls. This physician told the mother that he would investigate and call back if there were any problems. He then called the jail, and got to know that the son was being treated by the jail physician, and did nothing further. The young man died while being transported to the state prison. The appellate court affirmed a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Even if it were unethical for the defendant physician to treat the young man without the jail physician's consent, the jury could find negligence in the doctor's failure to ask the other doctor about the man's condition or at least to inform the parents that he was proceeding no further.

    Abandonment of a patient is considered as a tortious act. Physician should provide sufficient notice or provide a proficient physician in replacement before withdrawing from the case. A physician who leaves a patient in a serious condition of the disease, without any reason, or sufficient amount of notice to enable the patient to obtain another medical attendant, is guilty of a responsible negligence of duty. Physicians are liable for "unwarranted" abandonment of the patient or for abandoning the patient "without reason."

    Furthermore, the recommendation to decrease probable liability for a claim of patient abandonment; it is important to terminate relationship with a patient by providing letter notifying the termination of the physician patient relationship. There are certain guidelines for a termination letter as follow:

    ' Provide sufficient time at least 30 days period for the patient to find competent physician;

    ' Propose Short term emergency care;

    ' Provide resources of competent physician in his place;

    ' Physician should provide duplicate of the patient's medical record to the new care provider with appropriate authorization.

    To conclude, once the physician-patient relationship has been established by mean of contract or agreement, a physician must provide treatment to the patient. A patient has more flexibility to terminate the relationship, should act in a professional and prudent manner. Once the relationship is established, the physician is limited in the ways and reasons that he or she can terminate the relationship with a patient. If physician wants to terminate relationship due to certain reason than he should follow certain steps. If he fails to do so then he should be consider under abandonment.

    More from LawTeacher

    Example Essays: Doctor Patient Relationship

    1. Doctor/patient

    Should a doctor always tell the truth to his patient. Telling the truth and untruth, in fact, takes one of the common questions that our humanity tried to solve over time but unfortunately nobody knows exactly what is better: always telling the truth or concealing some information and lying.Not telling the truth in the doctor-patient relationship requires special attention because some patients today, more than ever, experience serious harm if doctors hide some information about patient"s condition. They need it because they are ill, vulnerable, and they want to feel support in their r.

    2. Cultural Issues in Patient Care

    A huge contributor to the lack of communication between doctor and patient is the cultural incompetence amongst doctors. With better communication between doctor and patient comes better care. Unlike other professional relationships, doctors' interpretations and decisions impact their patient's life. "Culture can have important clinical consequences in the patient-physician relationship. How can doctors create a safer environment for patients.

    3. Cultural Issues in Patient Care

    A huge contributor to the lack of communication between doctor and patient is the cultural incompetence amongst doctors. With better communication between doctor and patient, comes better care. Unlike other professional relationships, doctors' interpretations and decisions impact their patient's life. "Culture can have important clinical consequences in the patient-physician relationship. How can doctors create a safer environment for patients.

    4. Healthcare and Patient Privacy

    Though it is important that a patient and his/her doctor are able to form a particular relationship that will ensure the patient is open and free with the doctor and information shared is private. If a patient is comfortable enough to share private information about him/herself, it would lead to the establishment of a mutually beneficial relationship. Though it can be noted that if a doctor that a patient is used to is suddenly switched, there is a very high chance that the patient would not feel comfortable in sharing information with the new doctor or may lie to avoid sharing intimat.

    5. My Hero - Dr. David Duncan Main

    Patients don't trust doctors any more, even some individual patients have attacked doctors who treated them. So I decided to search some information about physician-patient relationship, at last I found that the physician-patient relationship 100 years ago was much better than now in China. And there is another important thing I want to say is the physician-patient relationship. Doctors treated patients like they're patients friends. Patients and doctors respected each other.

    6. Paternalism - The Preservation of Patient Autonomy

    While doctors are educated on medical conditions and the requirements for successful treatment, a patient does not have the training necessary to reach certain judgments about their condition (class notes). Also, even if a doctor does thoroughly explain his reasoning and treatment, a patient may feel too emotionally overwhelmed to reach a decision consistent with his values. However, a physician's best weapon against these concerns is a doctor-patient relationship based on truth and careful presentation of information. It's necessary to hold the doctor and the patient as individu.

    7. Dreams- timothy findley

    It is often mistaken that doctors give more of a lasting affect on the patients. Findley used these contrasting characters to convey the underlying message of the story: a doctor/ patient relationship should be symbiotic. Because of Everett"s lack of understanding of the patient/ doctor relationship, he didn"t know why Kenneth was appearing in his dreams. Findley"s point is that the relationship between a patient and a doctor is delicate and requires a stable balance. The patient has as much an affect on the doctor as the doctor has on the patient.

    8. English Patient

    In Michael Ondaatje"s The English Patient, the lives of several characters, particularly Hana (a Canadian nurse), Count Laszlo de Almasy (the English patient), Kip (a Sikh bomb dismanteler), and Caravaggio (a thief by profession) are shaped by their involvement in World War II (Italy 1944), and act as a catalyst for the relationships that develop between them. How the patient received his terrible injuries. He knows she is "more patient than nurseaE (p.95-96). "He is a doctor, has two children and a laughing wife. The relationships that develops in the story are very pas.

    9. Wit by Margaret Edson

    Margaret Edson's play, "Wit," portrays a terminal ovarian cancer patient, Vivian Bearing, who goes through an experimental chemotherapy program that her doctor suggested. The doctor that objectifies Bearing is only interested in the results of the experiment due to operant conditioning. Kelekian and his students gave Vivian Bearing no comfort on a personal level nor did they try to build relationships with her. Just like in the play, many people in the healthcare field tend to avoid close relationships with their patients and possibly even objectify their patients. The p.

    10. Euthanasia

    The outcome of that debate will profoundly affect family relationships, interaction between doctors and patients, and concepts of basic ethical behavior. When does the patient's right to refuse treatment override the state's interest? What does the right to refuse treatment entail, and is it included in the patient's right to privacy? Do a patient's guardians have the right to refuse treatment on behalf of a patient. In the same March poll of 1,031 nationwide, 30.4% of those surveyed would rather have a doctor put a merciful end to their suffering than wait for a na.

    11. nurssing

    These trained professionals assist doctors and specialists in virtually every area of medicine. Patients and doctors, alike, realize the value of the services nurses provide. After completing orders from doctors, nurses perform more ordinary tasks. Modern techniques encourage patients and doctors to decide on methods of therapy together ("Principles of Therapy,aE par. 3). "Guidelines for Rehabilitative NursingaE states that the student will "observe relationships/interactions among patient, family and staff members and discuss the effect of these relationships on th.

    12. The Use Of Force

    The doctor is the protagonist and the patient or the young girl is the antagonist. This is indicated in the first paragraph when the author writes, " They were new patients to me, all I had was the name, OlsenaE. The use of the family"s last name shows how impersonal the relationship between them and the doctor is. In knowing this, the first impressions the doctor has of the patient and her family is very important.The doctor describes the mother as " a big, startled- looking woman, very clean and apologetic.aE Then he describes the child, " The child was fairly eating me up wi.


    The issue has affected family relationships, interaction between doctors and patients, and concepts of basic morality.According to the concise Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, euthanasia is defined as °either painlessly putting to death or failing to postpone death from natural causes, as in cases of terminal illness ±. Many people saw him die on television and they were polarized on the issue of why he chose to die and why his wife agreed with the doctor ¯s decision. As long as patients are in the hospital, their family has to spend time taking care of the patient. However.

    14. Medical Malpractice Crisis

    The insurance industry claims premium hikes are largely due to the increase in lawsuits by injured patients. The big problem many patients face is when to sue the doctors. In the early 1970s and 1980s, patients rarely sued because they were not aware of the medical mistakes. The doctors" rallies and strikes foreshadow a continuing problem for patients. We need doctors to take care of the patients.

    15. Relationship Between Nurse Practitioner and Medical Practitioner

    Why Can't We All Just Get Along:The Relationship between Nurse Practitioner and Medical Practitioner There is a patient in front of you. Do you want wellness for the patient, including the social, emotional, nutritional, and familial aspects of that patient"s life or do you want the injury/illness/infection gone and the patient back to routine living. IntroductionIn Creative Nursing, Tim Porter-O"Grady (2003) discusses that we are moving into a new healthcare relationship with our patients, one that will increase the patient"s expectation of positivity and will require all.

    16. Dibs In Search Of Self

    The environment of a play therapy room must be familiar to the patient. Before Dibs was in play therapy he did not have a good relationship with his parents. Dibs was shy when he first met Doctor Axline. Doctor Axline soon found out how intelligent he was. They were very appreciative of the work doctor Axline had done.

    17. wit

    But actually this play is not about doctors, cancers, how the patient is fighting for life all that, it"s about the kindness and compassions by showing as well arrogance and insensitivity, it"s about the importance of human relationships. But in the other hand she is not that confident in dealing with relationships with other people. He has the passion to do his research, but does not care about his patient. He wants to be a doctor not because he wants to help people in need, but wants the fame that would come from discovering a cure for cancer. But she really cares about the patie.

    18. Patch Adams

    PATCH ADAMSSynopsis Based on a true history, the movie is the biography of the doctor Patch Adams who revolutionized the official medical community applying singular therapies which consisted of making laugh and provide affection to the sick patients of cancer. Hunter has as room partner an esquizofrenic, he can't begin any relationship with him, until the other voluntary patient makes Patch (as they call it the interns) see that the life is more than what we see ,that we must always see beyond. never keep the first impression. In parallel form, he knows the hospit.

    19. The therapeutic relationship

    In order for a practitioner to initiate a therapeutic relationship, she must first set the client at ease: ". the physician (practitioner) tries to enter the patient"s world, to see the illness through the patient"s eyes by behaviour that invites and facilitates the patient"s opennessaE (Levenstein et al, 1989, p.111). Also mentioned is the use of furniture as barriers: this is the cliche of the doctor who sits distant and aloof behind his enormous desk, making the patient feel "smallaE and unimportant. Generally, the literature on therapeutic relationships does not focus.

    20. Ethics in Medicine

    It pertains to persons in the healthcare field, and how they deal with their proffesional relationships, as far as colleages, patients, and others areserved. Of all the possible principle that could have been a problem to deal with, the one in this situation deals with the relationship of doctor to patient. Though in the doctor denying the referral, the patient loses out on what works best for her. Some doctors refuse to consider any form of alternative therapy as a serious option for their patients. As mentioned earlier, patients are entitled to a second opinion, and if one do.

    21. A career as a Psychiatrist

    A child and adolescent psychiatrist is basically a Doctor of Medicine with a license to prescribe medications to their patients. They use their knowledge of biological, psychological, and social factors in working with patients. However their salary may depend on how many private patients they have and the setting at which they work. For example, when trying to calm down a patient who is acting very difficult, the patients might react with physical actions that may result in hitting the psychiatrist or other physical damages.People going into psychiatry should be compassionate and.