Kant S Ethics Essay Ideas - Homework for you

Homework for you

Kant S Ethics Essay Ideas

Rating: 4.9/5.0 (33 Votes)

Category: Essay

Description

Книга - Kant S Ethics Essay Research Paper Kant - Иностранный язык

Kant S Ethics Essay, Research Paper

In the Metaphysics of Ethics (1797) Kant described his ethical system, which is based on a belief that the reason is the final authority for morality. Actions of any sort, he believed, must be undertaken from a sense of duty dictated by reason, and no action performed for expediency

or solely in obedience to law or custom can be regarded as moral. Kant described two types of commands given by reason. The first was hypothetical imperative, which dictates a given course of action to reach a specific end, and the categorical imperative, which dictates a course of

action that must be followed because of its rightness and necessity. The categorical imperative is the basis of morality and was stated by Kant as “Act as if the maxim of your action were to

become through your will a general natural law.”

Kant s broke his rule based ethics down into two parts. The first being hypotheticalimperative reason. It is a method in which we try to attainan end such as happiness. The hypothetical imperative includes the ability to lie under certain circumstances when it is prudent.

The hypothetical imperative also exerts heteronomy of the will, in that the will is following desire which is dictating to the will what to do. The categorical imperative requires the autonomy of the

will, as the categorical imperative requires that we make choices to follow universal laws, and that

we are not doing something because we will get something else from it.

Kant emphasizes the importance of rationality in being moral by calling moral beings “rational beings.” To find what is moral through the categorical imperative requires reason and logic and for the consequences of an action for be thoroughly thought through. This requires that

a rational being have a certain set of similar characteristics. A rational being must firstly be rational, logical, and objective, not led about by desire and moral feeling. He must also be introspective in order that he recognize that an act must be thought through to determine whether

or not it is moral. This requires a certain degree of hyper- consciousness. Intuition is also a requirement of the rational being, as he must be able to make connections. It also requires that the rational being try to be objective and consider many possible courses of actions. Finally, a rational

being must have a certain degree of high intelligence in order for what he reasons to be moral, correct, and veridical. To be a rational being requires not only the innate ability to be rational, introspective/hyper-conscious, andintuitive, but it requires a certain degree of intellectual and psychological intelligence that allows the individual to make use of the above qualities by being able to make connections and to relate.

As humans I think we have a hard time living up to the moral demands of Kant s philosophy. Kant says we have to live by duty and respect of laws that lead to universality. Kant says, we have to use this rule system of categorical imperative to keep order in society. If we use just one set of rules and ethics humans are not fighting over what rules are right or wrong.

According to Kant we have a duty, or commitment to each rule we make up. Categorical imperative are rules for rules, and to follow these rules Kant gives us three guidelines duty, respect, and universality. We has humans have a duty, or commitment to each rule. Each rule must be respected, and never use any person as a mean of an end. Universality ask can the rule be

followed or applied. Kant says, any rule that does not apply for everyone can not follow this set of

rules for making up rules for society.

Many times humans follow the hypothetical imperative. This allows us as humans to lie under this method of reasoning when needed. Many times this leads into what Kant called the slippery slope. Once you lie and bend the rule once it makes it OK to do it again. This forms a

step method after bending one rule and then stepping down and bending another rule. Kant s philosophy is important even though many humans cannot follow it. Most times we all end up on the slippery slope bending the truth as needed. This is why we can not follow Kant s philosophy because we fall out of the three guidelines. The guidelines are important to keep society in line

with the rules, but has humans we are not perfect and many times fall far from Kant s philosophy.

Other articles

Kant S Ethics Essay Research Paper Kant

Kant S Ethics Essay Research Paper Kant

Kant S Ethics Essay, Research Paper

In the Metaphysics of Ethics (1797) Kant described his ethical system, which is based on a belief that the reason is the final authority for morality. Actions of any sort, he believed, must be undertaken from a sense of duty dictated by reason, and no action performed for expediency

or solely in obedience to law or custom can be regarded as moral. Kant described two types of commands given by reason. The first was hypothetical imperative, which dictates a given course of action to reach a specific end, and the categorical imperative, which dictates a course of

action that must be followed because of its rightness and necessity. The categorical imperative is the basis of morality and was stated by Kant as “Act as if the maxim of your action were to

become through your will a general natural law.”

Kant s broke his rule based ethics down into two parts. The first being hypotheticalimperative reason. It is a method in which we try to attainan end such as happiness. The hypothetical imperative includes the ability to lie under certain circumstances when it is prudent.

The hypothetical imperative also exerts heteronomy of the will, in that the will is following desire which is dictating to the will what to do. The categorical imperative requires the autonomy of the

will, as the categorical imperative requires that we make choices to follow universal laws, and that

we are not doing something because we will get something else from it.

Kant emphasizes the importance of rationality in being moral by calling moral beings “rational beings.” To find what is moral through the categorical imperative requires reason and logic and for the consequences of an action for be thoroughly thought through. This requires that

a rational being have a certain set of similar characteristics. A rational being must firstly be rational, logical, and objective, not led about by desire and moral feeling. He must also be introspective in order that he recognize that an act must be thought through to determine whether

or not it is moral. This requires a certain degree of hyper- consciousness. Intuition is also a requirement of the rational bei

ng, as he must be able to make connections. It also requires that the rational being try to be objective and consider many possible courses of actions. Finally, a rational

being must have a certain degree of high intelligence in order for what he reasons to be moral, correct, and veridical. To be a rational being requires not only the innate ability to be rational, introspective/hyper-conscious, andintuitive, but it requires a certain degree of intellectual and psychological intelligence that allows the individual to make use of the above qualities by being able to make connections and to relate.

As humans I think we have a hard time living up to the moral demands of Kant s philosophy. Kant says we have to live by duty and respect of laws that lead to universality. Kant says, we have to use this rule system of categorical imperative to keep order in society. If we use just one set of rules and ethics humans are not fighting over what rules are right or wrong.

According to Kant we have a duty, or commitment to each rule we make up. Categorical imperative are rules for rules, and to follow these rules Kant gives us three guidelines duty, respect, and universality. We has humans have a duty, or commitment to each rule. Each rule must be respected, and never use any person as a mean of an end. Universality ask can the rule be

followed or applied. Kant says, any rule that does not apply for everyone can not follow this set of

rules for making up rules for society.

Many times humans follow the hypothetical imperative. This allows us as humans to lie under this method of reasoning when needed. Many times this leads into what Kant called the slippery slope. Once you lie and bend the rule once it makes it OK to do it again. This forms a

step method after bending one rule and then stepping down and bending another rule. Kant s philosophy is important even though many humans cannot follow it. Most times we all end up on the slippery slope bending the truth as needed. This is why we can not follow Kant s philosophy because we fall out of the three guidelines. The guidelines are important to keep society in line

with the rules, but has humans we are not perfect and many times fall far from Kant s philosophy.

FREE Kant s ethics Essay

Topics in this paper Popular Topics

Kant has devised an ethic moral theory that he suggests people should live by. It is different from the utilitarian view because it is not based on emotion which Kant feels leaves to much room for injustice. His theory believes that if there is a moral rule that is in place, then it should always be followed.

His first formulation of the universal law states that one should act only according to the maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law. In order to apply this formulation you would consider these three statements. The first question being, what rule would you be following if you were to perform this act? Meaning is there a moral rule that is already in place? Secondly, would a rational person want to universalize this rule? A person who is considered to be rational must know that difference between morally right and wrong and the difference in using a person with their knowledge and using a person without their knowledge. Once this is determined you have to decide whether the whole society should follow this rule. And thirdly, if you want to universalize the rule then the act is permissible. If you are not willing to universalize the rule then the act is morally impermissible. Therefore, once it is agreed that the rule is moral and justified by a rational person who feels that it should be universalized, it is allowed, and vice versa.

An example of this would be: You are doing your taxes. You discover that you are required to pay much more than you had first calculated. Imagine that you are a tax expert and you know that you can falsify your records without getting caught (so that you pay the government less than is legally required). You decide to cheat on your taxes.

If you were to falsify your tax records then you would be following the rule of lying. As a rational person you would not want to universalize this rule and allow lying to be accepted. If that occ

Essays Related to Kant's ethics

Kant S Ethics Essay, Research Paper Kant

Kant S Ethics Essay, Research Paper

In the Metaphysics of Ethics (1797) Kant described his ethical system, which is based on a belief that the reason is the final authority for morality. Actions of any sort, he believed, must be undertaken from a sense of duty dictated by reason, and no action performed for expediency

or solely in obedience to law or custom can be regarded as moral. Kant described two types of commands given by reason. The first was hypothetical imperative, which dictates a given course of action to reach a specific end, and the categorical imperative, which dictates a course of

action that must be followed because of its rightness and necessity. The categorical imperative is the basis of morality and was stated by Kant as “Act as if the maxim of your action were to

become through your will a general natural law.”

Kant s broke his rule based ethics down into two parts. The first being hypotheticalimperative reason. It is a method in which we try to attainan end such as happiness. The hypothetical imperative includes the ability to lie under certain circumstances when it is prudent.

The hypothetical imperative also exerts heteronomy of the will, in that the will is following desire which is dictating to the will what to do. The categorical imperative requires the autonomy of the

will, as the categorical imperative requires that we make choices to follow universal laws, and that

we are not doing something because we will get something else from it.

Kant emphasizes the importance of rationality in being moral by calling moral beings “rational beings.” To find what is moral through the categorical imperative requires reason and logic and for the consequences of an action for be thoroughly thought through. This requires that

a rational being have a certain set of similar characteristics. A rational being must firstly be rational, logical, and objective, not led about by desire and moral feeling. He must also be introspective in order that he recognize that an act must be thought through to determine whether

or not it is moral. This requires a certain degree of hyper- consciousness. Intuition is also a requirement of the rational being, as he must be able to make connections. It also requires that the rational being try to be objective and consider many possible courses of actions. Finally, a rational

being must have a certain degree of high intelligence in order for what he reasons to be moral, correct, and veridical. To be a rational being requires not only the innate ability to be rational, introspective/hyper-conscious, andintuitive, but it requires a certain degree of intellectual and psychological intelligence that allows the individual to make use of the above qualities by being able to make connections and to relate.

As humans I think we have a hard time living up to the moral demands of Kant s philosophy. Kant says we have to live by duty and respect of laws that lead to universality. Kant says, we have to use this rule system of categorical imperative to keep order in society. If we use just one set of rules and ethics humans are not fighting over what rules are right or wrong.

According to Kant we have a duty, or commitment to each rule we make up. Categorical imperative are rules for rules, and to follow these rules Kant gives us three guidelines duty, respect, and universality. We has humans have a duty, or commitment to each rule. Each rule must be respected, and never use any person as a mean of an end. Universality ask can the rule be

followed or applied. Kant says, any rule that does not apply for everyone can not follow this set of

rules for making up rules for society.

Many times humans follow the hypothetical imperative. This allows us as humans to lie under this method of reasoning when needed. Many times this leads into what Kant called the slippery slope. Once you lie and bend the rule once it makes it OK to do it again. This forms a

step method after bending one rule and then stepping down and bending another rule. Kant s philosophy is important even though many humans cannot follow it. Most times we all end up on the slippery slope bending the truth as needed. This is why we can not follow Kant s philosophy because we fall out of the three guidelines. The guidelines are important to keep society in line

with the rules, but has humans we are not perfect and many times fall far from Kant s philosophy.

Реферат: Kant S Ethics Essay Research Paper Kant - Сайт рефератов, докладов, сочинений, дипломных и к

Kant S Ethics Essay Research Paper Kant

Kant S Ethics Essay Research Paper

In the Metaphysics of Ethics (1797) Kant described his ethical system which is based on a belief that the reason is the final authority for morality. Actions of any sort he believed must be undertaken from a sense of duty dictated by reason and no action performed for expediency

or solely in obedience to law or custom can be regarded as moral. Kant described two types of commands given by reason. The first was hypothetical imperative which dictates a given course of action to reach a specific end and the categorical imperative which dictates a course of

action that must be followed because of its rightness and necessity. The categorical imperative is the basis of morality and was stated by Kant as “Act as if the maxim of your action were to

become through your will a general natural law.”

Kant s broke his rule based ethics down into two parts. The first being hypotheticalimperative reason. It is a method in which we try to attainan end such as happiness. The hypothetical imperative includes the ability to lie under certain circumstances when it is prudent.

The hypothetical imperative also exerts heteronomy of the will in that the will is following desire which is dictating to the will what to do. The categorical imperative requires the autonomy of the

will as the categorical imperative requires that we make choices to follow universal laws and that

we are not doing something because we will get something else from it.

Kant emphasizes the importance of rationality in being moral by calling moral beings “rational beings.” To find what is moral through the categorical imperative requires reason and logic and for the consequences of an action for be thoroughly thought through. This requires that

a rational being have a certain set of similar characteristics. A rational being must firstly be rational logical and objective not led about by desire and moral feeling. He must also be introspective in order that he recognize that an act must be thought through to determine whether

or not it is moral. This requires a certain degree of hyper- consciousness. Intuition is also a requirement of the rational being as he must be able to make connections. It also requires that the rational being try to be objective and consider many possible courses of actions. Finally a rational

being must have a certain degree of high intelligence in order for what he reasons to be moral correct and veridical. To be a rational being requires not only the innate ability to be rational introspective/hyper-conscious andintuitive but it requires a certain degree of intellectual and psychological intelligence that allows the individual to make use of the above qualities by being able to make connections and to relate.

As humans I think we have a hard time living up to the moral demands of Kant s philosophy. Kant says we have to live by duty and respect of laws that lead to universality. Kant says we have to use this rule system of categorical imperative to keep order in society. If we use just one set of rules and ethics humans are not fighting over what rules are right or wrong.

According to Kant we have a duty or commitment to each rule we make up. Categorical imperative are rules for rules and to follow these rules Kant gives us three guidelines duty respect and universality. We has humans have a duty or commitment to each rule. Each rule must be respected and never use any person as a mean of an end. Universality ask can the rule be

followed or applied. Kant says any rule that does not apply for everyone can not follow this set of

rules for making up rules for society.

Many times humans follow the hypothetical imperative. This allows us as humans to lie under this method of reasoning when needed. Many times this leads into what Kant called the slippery slope. Once you lie and bend the rule once it makes it OK to do it again. This forms a

step method after bending one rule and then stepping down and bending another rule. Kant s philosophy is important even though many humans cannot follow it. Most times we all end up on the slippery slope bending the truth as needed. This is why we can not follow Kant s philosophy because we fall out of the three guidelines. The guidelines are important to keep society in line

with the rules but has humans we are not perfect and many times fall far from Kant s philosophy.

“which we Disinterestedness has been a reaccurant theme in aesthetic thought throughout recent times. Kant was one of the first to discribe disinterestedness as an basic and universal part of the aesthetic judgement experiance. However the notion of disinterestedness did not origninate with Kant; it is to be found in the writtings of many Eighteenth centuray philosophers such as Stolinitz, Shaftsbury, Hutcheson, Gerard and Burke.

Kant: Goodness Essay, Research Paper Kant: Goodness The philosopher I used is Immanuel Kant. He was very practical in his thinking of goodness. A quote of his was “I ought, therefore I can”. His view

’s Copernican System Essay, Research Paper The Architectonic Form of Kant’s Copernican System Human reason is by nature architectonic. That is to say, it regards all our

Essay, Research Paper Jill had been driving down a deserted road when her tire became flat. With no one around for miles she struggled with changing the tire when Jack happened to be driving by and stopped to give her a hand. How and why is this an act of genuine moral worth?

Categorical Imperative Essay, Research Paper The principle of private happiness states that an individual?s prosperity is weighed in proportion to that person?s good conduct. In short,

Synthetic A-Priori Proposition Essay, Research Paper Are There Synthetic A-Priori Propositions? From a logical point of view, the propositions that express human knowledge can be divided according to two distinctions. First is the distinction between propositions that are a priori, in the sense that they are knowable prior to experience, and those that are a posteriori, in the sense that they are knowable only after experience.

Research Paper Kant theorizes that synthetic a priori judgments are conceived before an event occurs. He makes the assumption that these synthetic a priori judgments are plausible without any empirical knowledge, exposure, experience, or any related comprehension. Ergo it is false to assume that synthetic a priori conclusions are not justifiable because the articulation of conscious and unconscious stimuli is an occurrence since birth.

’s Ontological Argument Essay, Research Paper As a theologian and philosopher, Saint Anselm strove to prove the existence of God in reality. The bulk of his argument is found in Chapter II of Proslogium.

Kant`s Morality Essay, Research Paper Kant starts off making two distinctions regarding kinds of knowledge, empirical/rational and formal/material. Empirical or experience-based knowledge

Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper In today’s society, if you ask five people who Jack Kevorkian is then three or more would know who he is. The issue of euthanasia has been on the media’s forefront for several years. There are several pros and cons to this issue. Some of these pros are as follows: it would help to end pain and suffering, it allows a person to die with dignity, and it also helps the grieving process because the person knows when they are gonna die.

Kant Essay, Research Paper Duty and Reason as the Ultimate Principle: Kant Kant claims that only actions from duty have moral worth. In other words, actions from motives other than duty deserve no positive moral evaluation. I like and agree with Kant?s view because I believe that a good will makes a good person.

’s Pieta A Better Work Of Art Than Duchamp’s Fountain Would Kant And Hume Agree. Essay, Research Paper When one looks at two very different works of art like Michelangelo?s Pieta and Duchamp?s Fountain

Research Paper Whereas a teleological theory of ethics holds that an action is right, depending on the consequences; a deonteological theory states that an action is right, depending on the nature of the act itself, or of the intention of the person performing the act. Immanuel Kant, a deonteologist, once said, “It is man’s ability to reason, his own ability to think objectively and apart from his own circumstances and doings, that distinguishes him from all other creatures.” Reason is an innate intellectual power, existing more or less equally in everyone.

Kant Essay, Research Paper KANT Kant begins to claim that there is nothing in the world that can be regarded as good without qualification except good will. He says that qualities of temperment such as

Rationality Essay, Research Paper Mark Klass June 1, 2000 I believe rationality is incorrectly dictated by society. Generally when one is irrational he or she is contradicting the “normal” or what everyone is programmed to do. Kant says “Can you also will that your maxim should become a universal law.”1 In part I agree to the theory of universal law where “rational” is judged by universality or what everyone should do.

Kant: The Universal Law Formation Of The Categorical Imperative Essay, Research Paper Kant: the Universal Law Formation of the Categorical Imperative

Research Paper Transcendentalism: The Philosophy of the Mind Transcendentalism is the view that the basic truth of the universe lies beyond the knowledge obtained from the senses, a

Metaphysis Essay, Research Paper. Hello. I need help, I have somes question would help me. 1. do the criticisms that hume makes of Design Arguments all apply to Thomas’ Teleological Argument?

– Enlightenment Essay, Research Paper What is enlightenment? Immanuel Kant attempts to clarify the meaning of enlightenment while composing the essay, “What is Enlightenment?”. This document was written in response to political and social changes brought about by King Frederick of Prussia. The goal of Kant’s essay was to discuss what the nature of enlightenment was.

Paper The categorical imperative is a better guide for moral reasoning because it can be applied by the individual with a clear, understandable reverence for the

Kant And Utilitarianism Essay, Research Paper First of all I want to state the Kantian and the Utilitarian views butt heads on this issue. The Kantian view is nonconsequential, that is as a matter of

’s Fundamental Principles Of The Metaphysic Of Morals Essay, Research Paper Kant states (38,) “act as if the maxim of thy action were to become by thy will a universal law of nature”. This “categorical imperative” forms the basis of his book, Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals. Though at times his writing is confusing Kant lays out his logic as to what a categorical imperative is.

American Transcendentalism Essay, Research Paper American Transcendentalism Transcendentalism as espoused by Ralph Waldo Emerson is essen tially an idealist philosophy, derived from Kant’s concept of the Tran scendental and opposed to the skepticism of Locke and the Empiricists. In the essay The Transcendentalist, Emerson wrote, “[Kant showed] that there was a very important class of ideas or imperative forms, which do not come by experience, but through which experience was acquired; that these were intuitions of the mind itself; and he denominated them Tran scendental forms.”1 According to Emerson’s understanding of Kant, Transcendentalism becomes a union of solipsism, under which the only verifiable reality is thought to be the self, and materialism, under which the only verifiable reality is the quantifiable external world of objects and sense data.

Kant?s Idea Of League Of Nations? Essay, Research Paper Along the years, we have witnessed in recent decades the ongoing globalization of world trade, followed by vast rates of investment, and witnessed a new interdependence of the global economic system. The income gap is growing at an unstoppable rate, both within countries and between developed and developing countries.

Immanuel Kant Essay, Research Paper Meetesh Patel Philosophy Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant is one of the most influential philosophers in the history of western philosophy. His contributions to metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and aesthetics have had a profound impact on almost every philosophical movement that followed him.

Paper The ethics of Immanuel Kant are based on the belief that ethics stem from rules and reason much like the law of gravity, they are universal and applied always regardless of circumstances. He believed that the capacity to reason was unique to man and when exercised this was what it meant to be a moral human being.

Paper Joshua Wegner Philosophy 101 12/07/00 Trentacoste Immanuel Kant vs. Joshua Wegner THE RIGHT TO PUNISH: RETRIBUTIVISM As a society we all accept the fact that if you do something wrong you must be held responsible for your actions and pay the consequences. We all accept the concept of punishment, even though we are aware that we, ourselves, could one day be subjected to answer for our actions.

Moral Theory Essay, Research Paper Moral Theory Respect for Persons: The moral theory, Respect for Persons, or Ethics of Respect for Persons, core theme is that all human beings should be paid equal respect. Like the bible says in Matthew 7:12, “. Do to others as you would have them do to you.”[1]. This theory has been connected to the German philosopher, Immanuel Kant.

Church And State Essay, Research Paper Church and State When I try to think of solutions to world problems in my mind I end up with a headache, in an absolute state of confusion, which brings me right back to the same problem I started out with. It is like a confusing arithmetic problem that I don?t quite understand but all many possible solutions come to my mind, but the light bulb has just not went off yet.

Kant Essay, Research Paper Immanuel Kant was a sound, grounded philosopher of the Enlightenment. His explanations were black and white, clear-cut, which may be seen as his greatest attribute, as well as his worst flaw. The drive behind all of Kant’s ideas was reason. To Kant, morality was a matter of rational, acting morally equaled acting rationally.

Paper Metaphysics as Addressed by Kant and Hume In the Prolegomena, Kant states that reading David Hume, “awakened him from his dogmatic slumber.” It was Hume’s An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding that made Kant aware of issues and prejudices in his life that he had previously been unaware of. This further prompted Kant to respond to Hume with his own analysis on the theory of metaphysics.

Kant Essay, Research Paper Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) had an interesting ethical system for reasoning. It is based on a belief that the reason is the final authority for morality. In Kant?s eyes reason is directly correlated with morals and ideals. Actions of any sort, he believed, must be undertaken from a sense of duty dictated by reason, and no action performed for appropriateness or solely in obedience to law or custom can be regarded as moral.

For Ourselves Essay, Research Paper Immanuel Kant simply stated the creed of the enlightenment. Dare to know. (Kant 1). To thinkers like Kant, to achieve enlightenment was to ?gain release from?self-incurred tutelage?[the] inability to make use of [one?s] understanding without direction from another. (Kant 1).

Transcendentalism Essay, Research Paper Transcendentalism was an important movement in literature that occurred during the years of 1836-1860. Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau were the best-known transcendentalists. Ralph Waldo Emerson gave the German philosopher, Immanuel Kant, the credit for making ?Transcendentalism? a familiar term.

’s Fundamental Principles Of The Metaphysics Of Moral Essay, Research Paper Kant’s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Moral The central concept of Kant’s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of

Реферат: Kant S Ethics Essay Research Paper Kant

Kant S Ethics Essay, Research Paper

In the Metaphysics of Ethics (1797) Kant described his ethical system, which is based on a belief that the reason is the final authority for morality. Actions of any sort, he believed, must be undertaken from a sense of duty dictated by reason, and no action performed for expediency

or solely in obedience to law or custom can be regarded as moral. Kant described two types of commands given by reason. The first was hypothetical imperative, which dictates a given course of action to reach a specific end, and the categorical imperative, which dictates a course of

action that must be followed because of its rightness and necessity. The categorical imperative is the basis of morality and was stated by Kant as “Act as if the maxim of your action were to

become through your will a general natural law.”

Kant s broke his rule based ethics down into two parts. The first being hypotheticalimperative reason. It is a method in which we try to attainan end such as happiness. The hypothetical imperative includes the ability to lie under certain circumstances when it is prudent.

The hypothetical imperative also exerts heteronomy of the will, in that the will is following desire which is dictating to the will what to do. The categorical imperative requires the autonomy of the

will, as the categorical imperative requires that we make choices to follow universal laws, and that

we are not doing something because we will get something else from it.

Kant emphasizes the importance of rationality in being moral by calling moral beings “rational beings.” To find what is moral through the categorical imperative requires reason and logic and for the consequences of an action for be thoroughly thought through. This requires that

a rational being have a certain set of similar characteristics. A rational being must firstly be rational, logical, and objective, not led about by desire and moral feeling. He must also be introspective in order that he recognize that an act must be thought through to determine whether

or not it is moral. This requires a certain degree of hyper- consciousness. Intuition is also a requirement of the rational being, as he must be able to make connections. It also requires that the rational being try to be objective and consider many possible courses of actions. Finally, a rational

being must have a certain degree of high intelligence in order for what he reasons to be moral, correct, and veridical. To be a rational being requires not only the innate ability to be rational, introspective/hyper-conscious, andintuitive, but it requires a certain degree of intellectual and psychological intelligence that allows the individual to make use of the above qualities by being able to make connections and to relate.

As humans I think we have a hard time living up to the moral demands of Kant s philosophy. Kant says we have to live by duty and respect of laws that lead to universality. Kant says, we have to use this rule system of categorical imperative to keep order in society. If we use just one set of rules and ethics humans are not fighting over what rules are right or wrong.

According to Kant we have a duty, or commitment to each rule we make up. Categorical imperative are rules for rules, and to follow these rules Kant gives us three guidelines duty, respect, and universality. We has humans have a duty, or commitment to each rule. Each rule must be respected, and never use any person as a mean of an end. Universality ask can the rule be

followed or applied. Kant says, any rule that does not apply for everyone can not follow this set of

rules for making up rules for society.

Many times humans follow the hypothetical imperative. This allows us as humans to lie under this method of reasoning when needed. Many times this leads into what Kant called the slippery slope. Once you lie and bend the rule once it makes it OK to do it again. This forms a

step method after bending one rule and then stepping down and bending another rule. Kant s philosophy is important even though many humans cannot follow it. Most times we all end up on the slippery slope bending the truth as needed. This is why we can not follow Kant s philosophy because we fall out of the three guidelines. The guidelines are important to keep society in line

with the rules, but has humans we are not perfect and many times fall far from Kant s philosophy.

Реферат на тему Kant S Ethics Essay Research Paper Kant

Kant S Ethics Essay, Research Paper

In the Metaphysics of Ethics (1797) Kant described his ethical system, which is based on a belief that the reason is the final authority for morality. Actions of any sort, he believed, must be undertaken from a sense of duty dictated by reason, and no action performed for expediency

or solely in obedience to law or custom can be regarded as moral. Kant described two types of commands given by reason. The first was hypothetical imperative, which dictates a given course of action to reach a specific end, and the categorical imperative, which dictates a course of

action that must be followed because of its rightness and necessity. The categorical imperative is the basis of morality and was stated by Kant as “Act as if the maxim of your action were to

become through your will a general natural law.”

Kant s broke his rule based ethics down into two parts. The first being hypotheticalimperative reason. It is a method in which we try to attainan end such as happiness. The hypothetical imperative includes the ability to lie under certain circumstances when it is prudent.

The hypothetical imperative also exerts heteronomy of the will, in that the will is following desire which is dictating to the will what to do. The categorical imperative requires the autonomy of the

will, as the categorical imperative requires that we make choices to follow universal laws, and that

we are not doing something because we will get something else from it.

Kant emphasizes the importance of rationality in being moral by calling moral beings “rational beings.” To find what is moral through the categorical imperative requires reason and logic and for the consequences of an action for be thoroughly thought through. This requires that

a rational being have a certain set of similar characteristics. A rational being must firstly be rational, logical, and objective, not led about by desire and moral feeling. He must also be introspective in order that he recognize that an act must be thought through to determine whether

or not it is moral. This requires a certain degree of hyper- consciousness. Intuition is also a requirement of the rational being, as he must be able to make connections. It also requires that the rational being try to be objective and consider many possible courses of actions. Finally, a rational

being must have a certain degree of high intelligence in order for what he reasons to be moral, correct, and veridical. To be a rational being requires not only the innate ability to be rational, introspective/hyper-conscious, andintuitive, but it requires a certain degree of intellectual and psychological intelligence that allows the individual to make use of the above qualities by being able to make connections and to relate.

As humans I think we have a hard time living up to the moral demands of Kant s philosophy. Kant says we have to live by duty and respect of laws that lead to universality. Kant says, we have to use this rule system of categorical imperative to keep order in society. If we use just one set of rules and ethics humans are not fighting over what rules are right or wrong.

According to Kant we have a duty, or commitment to each rule we make up. Categorical imperative are rules for rules, and to follow these rules Kant gives us three guidelines duty, respect, and universality. We has humans have a duty, or commitment to each rule. Each rule must be respected, and never use any person as a mean of an end. Universality ask can the rule be

followed or applied. Kant says, any rule that does not apply for everyone can not follow this set of

rules for making up rules for society.

Many times humans follow the hypothetical imperative. This allows us as humans to lie under this method of reasoning when needed. Many times this leads into what Kant called the slippery slope. Once you lie and bend the rule once it makes it OK to do it again. This forms a

step method after bending one rule and then stepping down and bending another rule. Kant s philosophy is important even though many humans cannot follow it. Most times we all end up on the slippery slope bending the truth as needed. This is why we can not follow Kant s philosophy because we fall out of the three guidelines. The guidelines are important to keep society in line

with the rules, but has humans we are not perfect and many times fall far from Kant s philosophy.